Predicting Response to In-Hospital Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Individuals Recovering From Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease / Predicción de la respuesta a la rehabilitación pulmonar hospitalaria en personas que se recuperan de exacerbaciones de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica

Background: Predicting the response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) could be valuable in defining admission priorities. We aimed to investigate whether the response of individuals recovering from a COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) could be forecasted using machine learning approaches. Method: This multicenter, retrospective study recorded data on anthropometrics, demographics, physiological characteristics, post-PR changes in six-minute walking distance test (6MWT), Medical Research Council scale for dyspnea (MRC), Barthel Index dyspnea (BId), COPD assessment test (CAT) and proportion of participants reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The ability of multivariate approaches (linear regression, quantile regression, regression trees, and conditional inference trees) in predicting changes in each outcome measure has been assessed. Results: Individuals with lower baseline 6MWT, as well as those with less severe airway obstruction or admitted from acute care hospitals, exhibited greater improvements in 6MWT, whereas older as well as more dyspnoeic individuals had a lower forecasted improvement. Individuals with more severe CAT and dyspnea, and lower 6MWT had a greater potential improvement in CAT. More dyspnoeic individuals were also more likely to show improvement in BId and MRC. The Mean Absolute Error estimates of change prediction were 44.70m, 3.22 points, 5.35 points, and 0.32 points for 6MWT, CAT, BId, and MRC respectively. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating individuals reaching the MCID of outcomes ranged from 61.78% to 98.99% and from 14.00% to 71.20%, respectively. Conclusion: While the assessed models were not entirely satisfactory, predictive equations derived from clinical practice data might help in forecasting the response to PR in individuals recovering from an ECOPD. Future larger studies will be essential to confirm the methodology, variables, and utility.(AU)

Predicting Response to In-Hospital Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Individuals Recovering From Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) could be valuable in defining admission priorities. We aimed to investigate whether the response of individuals recovering from a COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) could be forecasted using machine learning approaches. METHOD: This multicenter, retrospective study recorded data on anthropometrics, demographics, physiological characteristics, post-PR changes in six-minute walking distance test (6MWT), Medical Research Council scale for dyspnea (MRC), Barthel Index dyspnea (BId), COPD assessment test (CAT) and proportion of participants reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The ability of multivariate approaches (linear regression, quantile regression, regression trees, and conditional inference trees) in predicting changes in each outcome measure has been assessed. RESULTS: Individuals with lower baseline 6MWT, as well as those with less severe airway obstruction or admitted from acute care hospitals, exhibited greater improvements in 6MWT, whereas older as well as more dyspnoeic individuals had a lower forecasted improvement. Individuals with more severe CAT and dyspnea, and lower 6MWT had a greater potential improvement in CAT. More dyspnoeic individuals were also more likely to show improvement in BId and MRC. The Mean Absolute Error estimates of change prediction were 44.70m, 3.22 points, 5.35 points, and 0.32 points for 6MWT, CAT, BId, and MRC respectively. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating individuals reaching the MCID of outcomes ranged from 61.78% to 98.99% and from 14.00% to 71.20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: While the assessed models were not entirely satisfactory, predictive equations derived from clinical practice data might help in forecasting the response to PR in individuals recovering from an ECOPD. Future larger studies will be essential to confirm the methodology, variables, and utility.

Rehabilitation complexity scale and reimbursement of in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation.

Background: The use of case-based reimbursement for medical rehabilitation is greatly discussed. The investigators explored the relationship between disability and reimbursement opportunities in individuals with respiratory diseases undergoing in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), considering the correlation (if any) between the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS-E v13) scores used at admission and the actual reimbursement. Methods: This study is part of a larger prospective multicenter study conducted by eight Pulmonary Rehabilitation Units in Italy. Here, investigators considered only data from the Lombardy Region. On January 30th or February 28th, 2023, participants were allocated according to the main DRG into 4 groups [tracheostomized/ventilated (TX/V), chronic respiratory failure (CRF), COPD, and miscellaneous group]. We recorded anthropometrics, diagnosis, international outcome measures, and calculated admission and discharge RCS-E v13 scores and hospital stay reimbursement according to the healthcare system (HS). Results: Three hundred and sixteen participants were evaluated. Patients were elderly, in the majority of cases with CRF, presenting comorbidities, disability, dyspnea, and reduced effort tolerance. At admission, RCS-E v13 showed an average moderate value of complexity. The median (IQR) HS reimbursement/stay was different among groups. RCSE v13 evaluated at admission was weakly (r=0.3471), but significantly related to the HS reimbursement/stay (p<0.0001) mainly due to TX/V and miscellaneous subgroups, while no relationship was found for COPD and CRF patients. After PR, all outcome measures improved significantly in all groups (p<0.001 for all). Higher RCS-E v13 scores at admission did not correspond to a proper amount of reimbursement, being this latter under- or over-estimated if compared to needs assessed by RCS-E v13. RCS-E v13 at discharge decreased for all subgroups (range from -6 to -11) reaching a low value of complexity. Conclusions: The RCS-E v13 disability score does not fully mirror the HS reimbursement for patients undergoing inhospital PR.

Pulmonary rehabilitation and risk of fall in elderly with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on risk of fall in over 80 individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated the effectiveness of PR on the risk of fall in older as compared to younger than 80 individuals. METHODS: Parallel-group retrospective exploratory study of individuals undergone in-hospital PR. The risk of fall was defined as a gait speed ≤0.8 m/s (primary outcome). Outcome measures (exercise capacity, physical performance, symptoms, and health status) were also assessed. RESULTS: As compared to younger, individuals over 80 suffered from more severe symptoms, a reduction in physical performance and in exercise capacity and greater risk of fall (P=0.0001). The proportion of participants at risk of fall increased with age, and after PR decreased significantly without any significant difference between age groups. However, 53.4% of older individuals were still at risk of fall, as compared to 17.5% of those under 80 (P=0.0001). After PR, both populations had improved outcomes measures, without any significant between group differences. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with COPD pulmonary rehabilitation reduced the risk of fall, while improving outcome measures independent of age, however, more than 50% of those over 80 were still at risk of fall. The pulmonary rehabilitation programs for individuals over 80 should include strategies effective in reducing the risk of fall.

Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Role of vaccination.

Survivors of severe COVID-19 requiring hospital admission may suffer from short- and long-term sequelae, including disability and reduced physical performance. Vaccination and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are effective tools against COVID-19 effects. While the beneficial effect of each of these treatments is known, there are no data about their combined effect. In people admitted to PR hospitals after severe COVID-19 disease, we retrospectively analyzed whether PR outcome might be influenced by vaccination status. Ninety-six individuals were studied (46 vaccinated, 50 unvaccinated). Unvaccinated individuals were younger and less comorbid than vaccinated ones and had needed more intensive care support during the previous hospitalization. Measures of disability and physical performance did not differ between groups at the beginning and at the end of the PR program. However, each group showed a statistically significant improvement in all outcome measures (6-minute walking test, short physical performance battery, Barthel Index). We conclude that vaccination status does not influence the outcome of in-patient PR programs for survivors of severe COVID-19.

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on COPD Assessment Test Items in Individuals Classified as GOLD Group E.

BACKGROUND: A new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification has been proposed, based also on COPD Assessment Test (CAT). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this large, multicenter, retrospective study was to determine the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on CAT items in individuals with COPD, GOLD group E, recovering from an exacerbation (ECOPD). As secondary aims, we evaluated whether gender, associated chronic respiratory failure (CRF), and age might influence results. METHODS: Data of 2,213 individuals with available paired pre- and post-PR CAT were analyzed. Other common outcome measures were also assessed. RESULTS: After PR, total CAT improved from 20.8 ± 7.8 to 12.4 ± 6.9 (p = 0.000), and 1,911 individuals (86.4%) reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). All CAT items improved significantly without any significant difference among them. However, item "confidence with disease" improved significantly more in males than in females (p = 0.009). Total CAT and six out of eight items improved significantly more in individuals with CRF than in those without (all p < 0.001). Total CAT and three items improved significantly more in younger than in older individuals (p = 0.023). Only presence of CRF was significantly associated with the probability of improving total CAT more than the MCID. CONCLUSION: In individuals with COPD, GOLD group E, recovering from ECOPD, PR improves all CAT items; however, gender, associated CRF and age may influence the effect size, suggesting the need to evaluate all items in addition to total CAT score.

Supplemental oxygen and noninvasive ventilation.

The respiratory system attempts to maintain normal levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide. However, airflow limitation, parenchymal abnormalities and dysfunction of the respiratory pump may be compromised in individuals with advanced COPD, eventually leading to respiratory failure, with reduced arterial oxygen tension (hypoxaemia) and/or increased arterial carbon dioxide tension (P aCO2 ; hypercapnia). Hypoxaemia may persist in individuals with severe COPD despite smoking cessation and optimisation of pharmacotherapy. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) can improve survival in those with severe daytime hypoxaemia, whereas those with less severe hypoxaemia may only have improved exercise capacity and dyspnoea. Changes in respiratory physiology that occur during sleep further predispose to hypoxaemia, particularly in individuals with COPD. However, the major cause of hypoxaemia is hypoventilation. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may reduce mortality and need for intubation in individuals with COPD and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. However, NIV may also improve survival and quality of life in individuals with stable, chronic hypercapnia and is now suggested for those with prolonged hypercapnia (e.g. P aCO2 >55 mmHg 2-6 weeks after hospital discharge) when clinically stable and after optimisation of medical therapy including LTOT if indicated. Many questions remain about the optimal mode, settings and goal of NIV therapy.

COPD: Providing the right treatment for the right patient at the right time.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality that is both preventable and treatable. However, a major challenge in recognizing, preventing, and treating COPD is understanding its complexity. While COPD has historically been characterized as a disease defined by airflow limitation, we now understand it as a multi-component disease with many clinical phenotypes, systemic manifestations, and associated co-morbidities. Evidence is rapidly emerging in our understanding of the many factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of COPD and the identification of "early" or "pre-COPD" which should provide exciting opportunities for early treatment and disease modification. In addition to breakthroughs in our understanding of the origins of COPD, we are optimizing treatment strategies and delivery of care that are showing impressive benefits in patient-centered outcomes and healthcare utilization. This special issue of Respiratory Medicine, "COPD: Providing the Right Treatment for the Right Patient at the Right Time" is a summary of the proceedings of a conference held in Stresa, Italy in April 2022 that brought together international experts to discuss emerging evidence in COPD and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in honor of a distinguished friend and colleague, Claudio Ferdinando Donor (1948-2021). Claudio was a true pioneer in the field of pulmonary rehabilitation and the comprehensive care of individuals with COPD. He held numerous leadership roles in in the field, provide editorial stewardship of several respiratory journals, authored numerous papers, statement and guidelines in COPD and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and provided mentorship to many in our field. Claudio's most impressive talent was his ability to organize spectacular conferences and symposia that highlighted cutting edge science and clinical medicine. It is in this spirit that this conference was conceived and planned. These proceedings are divided into 4 sections which highlight crucial areas in the field of COPD: (1) New concepts in COPD pathogenesis; (2) Enhancing outcomes in COPD; (3) Non-pharmacologic management of COPD; and (4) Optimizing delivery of care for COPD. These presentations summarize the newest evidence in the field and capture lively discussion on the exciting future of treating this prevalent and impactful disease. We thank each of the authors for their participation and applaud their efforts toward pushing the envelope in our understanding of COPD and optimizing care for these patients. We believe that this edition is a most fitting tribute to a dear colleague and friend and will prove useful to students, clinicians, and researchers as they continually strive to provide the right treatment for the right patient at the right time. It has been our pleasure and a distinct honor to serve as editors and oversee such wonderful scholarly work.

Airflow grades, outcome measures and response to pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals after an exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with COPD may be staged according to symptoms and exacerbation history (GOLD groups: A-D) and on airflow obstruction (GOLD grades: 1-4). Guidelines recommend pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for these individuals, including those recovering from an exacerbation (ECOPD) OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether in individuals with clinically severe COPD, recovering from an ECOPD, the effect size of an in-hospital PR program would be affected by airflow severity grades and assessed outcome measures. METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre study. Participants were compared according to different GOLD airflow grades. In addition to the MRC dyspnoea scale, six-minute walking distance test and COPD assessment test (CAT), Barthel dyspnoea index (Bid), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were assessed, evaluating the proportion of individuals reaching the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) (responders). RESULTS: Data of 479 individuals, completing the program were evaluated. Most of the participants were allocated in GOLD grades 4, (57.6%) and 3 (22.1%). All outcome measures significantly improved after PR (p < 0.05), without any significant difference in the proportion of responders in any measure. CONCLUSIONS: in individuals with severe COPD, recovering from ECOPD the success rate of PR does not depend on airflow severity, or outcome measure assessed. In addition to the most used outcome measures, also Bid and SPPB are sensitive to PR.

Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on heart rate recovery in adult individuals with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Introduction: Heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise is a marker of disease severity and prognosis in cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. More than 30% of adult individuals with asthma may show a slow HRR. Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity in individuals with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on HRR in individuals with asthma as compared to those with COPD. Methods: Retrospective analysis of HRR one minute after the six-minute walking test (6MWT) was performed before and after an exercise training program. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Barthel Index-Dyspnea (BI-D), Medical Research Council (MRC) score for dyspnea, and the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand test (5STS) were also assessed as secondary outcome measures. Results: Slow HRR prevalence was significantly lower in individuals with asthma than with COPD (29.1 vs. 46.7%, respectively: p = 0.003). Post-program HRR did not change in more than 70% of individuals in either population and improved in 16% of both populations, whereas it actually worsened in 12 and 10% of individuals with asthma and COPD, respectively. The outcome measures significantly improved in both populations, irrespective of baseline HRR. Conclusion: In individuals with asthma or COPD, exercise training does not significantly improve HRR.

Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease according to inhaled therapy: The Maugeri study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Real-life studies report discordant prescribing of inhaled triple therapy (TT) among individuals with COPD. Guidelines recommend pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for persistent breathlessness and/or exercise limitation. This real-life study aimed to assess the effects of in-patient PR in individuals under TT as compared to other inhaled therapies (no TT). METHODS: Multicentric, retrospective analysis of data from individuals admitted to in-hospital PR. Baseline characteristics were recorded and lung function was assessed. Outcome measures were: 6-min walking test (6MWT: primary outcome), Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for dyspnoea, and COPD assessment test (CAT). RESULTS: Data of pre and post program 6MWT of 1139 individuals were available. Pulmonary rehabilitation resulted in significant improvement in 6MWT in both groups, however, the effect size (by 54.3 ± 69.7 vs 42.5 ± 64.2 m, p = 0.004) and proportion of individuals reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 6MWT (64.2%, vs 54.3%, p = 0.001) were higher in TT group. Both groups significantly improved also the other outcome measures. The significant independent predictors of reaching the MCID of 6MWT were hospital provenience, TT use, and high eosinophils count. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary rehabilitation results in significant benefits in individuals with COPD irrespective of the use of TT. However, individuals under TT report larger benefits in exercise tolerance than those under no TT.